'Borat' Movie Still Make Benefit Lawyers

« FCC to Apartment-Dwellers: Pick Your TV Poison | Main | Rosenfeld Adds Litigation Partner »

'Borat' Movie Still Make Benefit Lawyers

Thu Oct 25, 2007 @ 08:51AM PST

Posted by Matthew Heller

BoratA year after his glorious movie premiered, Borat Sagdiyev's celluloid journey through the American South is turning into the judicial equivalent of General Sherman's march. An Alabama etiquette teacher and her outraged dinner guests have now joined two South Carolina frat brothers, a Virginia rodeo spectator, a Mississippi churchgoer and, yes, another Alabama etiquette teacher in suing the makers of “Borat” and star Sacha Baron Cohen for duping them into participating in the hit mockumentary. Cohen and 20th Century Fox are alleged to have "conspired to subject the Plaintiffs to Cohen's lewd, insulting and offensive conduct," according to this lawsuit filed Oct. 19 in Birmingham federal court by Cindy Streit.

Streit, of Etiquette Training Services of Birmingham, is not to be confused with Kathie Martin, operator of The Etiquette School of Birmingham, who sued in December 2006 over her appearance in the film teaching the Kazakh ambassador some table manners. A "Borat" field coordinator recruited Streit to help arrange a "Southern, in-home style dining experience" for a "foreign dignitary" from Belarus. That developed into the infamous (and hilarious) dinner-party scene in which Borat horrifies the well-heeled guests by, among other things, returning from a bathroom visit with a plastic bag filled with what appears to be his bodily waste.

The fraud and right-of-publicity cases brought by the frat brothers and the rodeo guy, which were filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, were speedily dismissed on anti-SLAPP motions brought by Fox's go-to litigator for all things Borat, Louis Petrich. But in the Deep South, which doesn't have similar free speech protections, judges may be more receptive to an anti-“Borat” suit.

A federal judge in Mississippi declined to dismiss the case of churchgoer Ellen Johnston in August and barely disguised his distaste for the film. “There are indeed many reasonable Americans, especially those who are of an older generation, who are not familiar with the type of humor/satire that is depicted in the film Borat,” U.S. District W. Allen Pepper, who is in his mid-60s, said.

In an unusual move, Pepper certified an appeal of his own decision –- which means a “Borat” case could be one judicial step away from the U.S. Supreme Court.

UPDATED: The 5th Circuit denied leave to appeal Pepper's decision in a Nov. 13, 2007 order.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Borat' Movie Still Make Benefit Lawyers:

The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.