Decisions Roundup: $7M Netflix Class Action Settlement Approved

« PiracyWatch: Music Publishers Target Project Playlist, Popular Online Music Locator | Main | Uma Thurman's Parents Testify In Bizarre Stalker Trial »

Decisions Roundup: $7M Netflix Class Action Settlement Approved

Wed Apr 30, 2008 @ 12:46PM PST

Posted by Matthew Heller

Gavel_celeb_20061127Case: Chavez v. Netflix, Inc.

Court: Calif. 1st District Ct. of Appeal

Date: April 21, 2008

Facts: Plaintiff sued Netflix in a proposed class action over its DVD advertising practices. As part of a $7.3 million settlement, Netflix agreed to provide subscribers with a one-level membership upgrade for one month. An objector, Laura Ellis, argued that the agreement is an improper “coupon settlement” that fails to promote the purposes of class litigation. She and others also objected to the award of $2 million in attorney fees.

Holding: Contrary to Ellis's argument, coupon settlements -- which provide a free service of nominal value and no cash payment to class members -- are not inherently suspect. "In many cases, the coupon might induce the member to make a purchase he or she would not otherwise have made, which may actually produce a net benefit for the defendant. That is not the case here." The appeals court also found "no error or abuse of discretion in the [trial] court's methodology" for calculating the attorney fees award.

To view the opinion, click here.

Case: Richie Ramone v. Wal-Mart Stores

Court: USDC, S. N.Y.

Date: April 18, 2008

Facts: Plaintiff, a member of the punk rock band The Ramones from 1983 to 1987, alleged that the band, retailers and others infringed his copyright in six songs by exploiting them in digital format without his permission. Defendants argued that Richie Ramone licensed the digital distribution of the songs in his 1984 recording agreement with the band. The agreement refers to distribution "by any method now or hereafter known."

Holding: The trial judge granted a motion to dismiss, finding the language of the agreement clearly allows digital distribution. "The phrase 'now or hereafter known,' when referring to forms of reproduction, reveals that future technologies are covered by the agreement" and "It is not reasonable to construe the phrase ... to exclude Defendants' alleged digital download form, which now constitutes a form of reproduction."

To view the opinion, click here.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Decisions Roundup: $7M Netflix Class Action Settlement Approved:

The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or

The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.