F-bombs on C-SPAN? Fleeting Expletives Case Ready for Supreme Court

« Jerry Seinfeld's Jokes Were Devastating, Says Author in Slander Case | Main | 'Soul Men' Defamatory? Another Weinstein Project Legal Claim »

F-bombs on C-SPAN? Fleeting Expletives Case Ready for Supreme Court

Sun Nov 02, 2008 @ 10:44AM PST

By Eriq Gardner

SupremecourtJust in time for the election, on Tuesday the Supreme Court will be holding hearings in a case concerning the FCC's policies sanctioning broadcasters for "fleeting expletives."

The oral arguments raise some interesting questions soaked in irony: Will the lawyers arguing the case be allowed to curse? Will C-Span and other broadcasters be allowed to broadcast audio from the hearing? If so, and the decision comes back favorable to the FCC, will these broadcasters be fined heavy money if Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg drops the F-bomb on unsuspecting audiences?

Indeed, according to Bradcasting & Cable, C-Span has put in a request to broadcast the hearing on its cable channel and its XM radio station. The public policy channel makes these requests only rarely. No word on how much interest other cable news networks have in the case, especially since there's that other thing happening on Tuesday.

The SCOTUS blog analyzes the legal conundrum facing Chief Justice John Roberts:

According to the website, Roberts hasn't made a decision on C-SPAN's request or even whether he's going "to tell the lawyers, bluntly or subtly, not to use the words at issue."

One involved lawyer is ready curse up a storm.

“Unless the Court tells me not to,” says Carter G. Phillips of Washington’s Sidley Austin, representing the broadcasters, "I would not shy away from using those words. It is hard to argue parts of he case saying ‘F-word’ and ‘S-word.’ "

SCOTUS also tallies the news organizations that will be spelling out "fuck" and George Carlin's other dirty seven. The Associated Press? Undecided. The NY Times? Probably not. LA TImes? No (not even if McCain storms the offices looking for the Khalidi tape). Bloomberg News? Shit, they can't wait.

So interestingly, this case may be decided before it's even heard. We'll update Roberts' decision soon.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference F-bombs on C-SPAN? Fleeting Expletives Case Ready for Supreme Court:

The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.