Is PETA really barking mad about Super Bowl standards snub?

« John Landis now going after 'Thriller' theater production | Main | Stan Lee vs. Stan Lee Media goes bicoastal »

Is PETA really barking mad about Super Bowl standards snub?

Fri Jan 30, 2009 @ 02:55AM PST

By Eriq Gardner

Military_dog_barking Pity the poor lawyer in the standards department of a television network. The job is rather thankless and when something offensive gets on the air, it's usually he or she who faces scorn from all sides.

Alonzo Wickers, a partner in the Los Angeles office of Davis Wright Tremaine who often conducts reviews for news and entertainment companies, told us a few years back that there's a great deal of misperception out there about the confrontational relationship between standards lawyers and network brass. “I’ve worked on 35 or 40 shows (including 'South Park')," he said, "And I can count on one hand the number of times where there’s been true conflict.” 

That might be true, but there's nothing quite as big as the Super Bowl to get people nervous. This year, NBC is charging $3 million per 30-second spot, and NBC Sports chairman Dick Ebersol says this year's ad sales would probably set a record.

But not all ads are getting past the standards lawyers. 

PETA says it was denied the opportunity to run a risqué spot showing lingerie models frolicking amid broccoli and pumpkins. On its website, the org released an e-mail sent by NBC Universal VP of Advertising Standards Victoria Morgan that suggested the group edit out "licking pumpkins," "touching her breast with her hand while eating broccoli," "rubbing pelvic region with pumpkin," "screwing herself with broccoli," and more. Here's the letter.

Frankly, we feel a little bit sorry for Morgan. She must deal with network liability in the post-"wardrobe malfunction" era, and as THR's James Hibberd points out, this very well could be a clever ruse by PETA to score publicity without actually having to spend $3 million on the spot. 

If the latter is the case, it wouldn't be the first time something like this happened. In fact, trademarks on the Super Bowl are protected rather strongly, and if there's one thing that the gameis famous for in the legal community, it's all sorts of envelope-pushing, lawyer-provoking "ambush marketing" campaigns by advertisers.

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d69069e2010536f8e892970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is PETA really barking mad about Super Bowl standards snub?:


The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to Matthew.Belloni@thr.com

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or patrice.atiee@thr.com


The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.