Warner Bros. kicks them 'Dukes of Hazzard' from federal court

« Who owns the Obama photo? Poster fair-use fight takes new turn | Main | Are cellphones such a big piracy threat? »

Warner Bros. kicks them 'Dukes of Hazzard' from federal court

Wed Jul 15, 2009 @ 01:59AM PST

By Matthew Belloni

Dukes For the second time in a week, Warner Bros. has landed a punch in its ongoing boxing match with copyright lawyer Marc Toberoff. On the heels of the studio's trial win on a small accounting issue in the Toberoff-led Superman litigation, a judge has bounced a $15 million case Toberoff brought on behalf of the writer of the "Dukes of Hazzard" TV show from federal court. 

Due to various profits disputes and lawsuits over the years, Gy Waldron is entitled to 6.5% of gross receipts from the "Dukes" show and any "spin-offs." He now claims Warners isn't paying his percentage on the 2005 theatrical version of "Dukes" and a 2007 straight-to-DVD sequel. 

But Waldron isn't the actual plaintiff here. He apparently had a heart attack last year and assigned his rights to a Trust in South Dakota, and First National Bank in Sioux Falls brought the January lawsuit in Federal court as the trustee.

Now the case has been dismissed from federal court for lack of jurisdiction. Federal courts are for disputes between parties from different states, but Judge Gary Feess (who so memorably ruined Warners' Christmas in the "Watchmen" litigation with Fox) found that the South Dakota trust was actually being controlled by Waldron, a California resident. 

"Waldron's power over the Trust strongly suggests that his assignment of claims was primarily for the purposes of collection, i.e. to permit the Trust to attempt to recover damages in this Court, where Waldron is unable to proceed," Feess wrote. 

Legal issues aren't new to the "Dukes" franchise. Waldron threw his hat in the ring with a similar claim in 2005 during the last round of litigation brought by the owners of "Moonrunners," the original source material for the show. (If you recall, Toberoff convinced a judge to issue an injunction against the release of the first film, which caused Warners to pony up a reported $14 million settlement, an annoyance it is no doubt hoping to avoid this time around.)  Waldron's claims never went anywhere in the first case.   

Toberoff says he'll either appeal this ruling or just file the case again in state court. "It's not a ruling on the merits of the case," he reminded us.

Here's the judge's ruling.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Warner Bros. kicks them 'Dukes of Hazzard' from federal court:

The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to Matthew.Belloni@thr.com

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or patrice.atiee@thr.com

The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.