The future of embedded video will (or will not) be televised

« Hollywood Docket: IMAX vs. Cinemark; ComcastNBCU or else; Pirate Bay plundered | Main | Hollywood Docket: 'End of an era' for Pirate Bay; Ticketmaster-Live Nation antitrust; Shazam patent suit »

The future of embedded video will (or will not) be televised

Mon Nov 16, 2009 @ 10:08AM PST

By Eriq Gardner

Fox-news-tracking-h1n1 Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation has decided to crack down on Fox News clips appearing on the Internet, recently sending out more than 150 takedown notices to YouTube. The efforts caused the temporary shutdown of News1News' YouTube channel, which provides clips of Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly and the rest of the Fox News gang to a number of web outlets, including Huffington Post.

There are a couple of ways to read this new development.

At first, Fox News' DMCA claims seemed to be targeted at the liberal blogosphere as a way to prevent left wingers from ridiculing the channel's personalities. But Fox News later sent takedown demands and subsequently caused the shutdown of some right-leaning YouTube channels too, such as GlennbeckClipsDaily and ConservativeNation.

We wonder whether the crackdown on Fox News clips is the first phase of Murdoch's stated threats to scrub Google and its affiliates of News Corp. properties. Murdoch's plans have generated curiosity and heated discussion, including from lawyers debating whether his intentions fly under "fair use" analysis.

But there's another way to read what's going on.

In the past couple of years, many rights-holders have wondered whether embedded clips threaten their businesses. In May 2008, Fox, CBS and NBC took down RedLasso, a then-popular web service that let users search its database of recorded television for clips to post online. (After signing licensing deals, the company recently relaunched a more modest version.) 

Less noticed has been a New York court case between ASCAP and YouTube. In May, YouTube was ordered to pay $1.6 million plus future payments to account for the public performance of music on the video-sharing website. But that didn't end the case. 

After ASCAP started targeting websites and bloggers who embed clips, YouTube agreed to pick up the legal fight on downstream embedded uses of YouTube videos. Currently, both sides are before the Copyright Royalty Board arguing how much YouTube should be charged to allow its users to embed videos. 

The decision, as well as crackdowns by Murdoch and others, could end up impacting the future of embedded video clips online. 

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The future of embedded video will (or will not) be televised:

The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.