Why Tim Tebow is the new Janet Jackson

« Hollywood Docket: ageism settlement; file-sharing award slashed; 5 reasons why entertainment law rocks | Main | Hollywood Docket: 'Sherlock Holmes' tops pirate list; Live Nation-Ticketmaster; Carlos the Jackal »

Why Tim Tebow is the new Janet Jackson

Mon Jan 25, 2010 @ 07:40PM PST

By Eriq Gardner

918974de89_Tebow_12082009 This year's Super Bowl is likely to feature the most controversial non-football-related action since the infamous Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction.

Tim Tebow, star quarterback for the Florida Gators and a devout Christian, has filmed a commercial spot for the organization Focus on the Family. The spot's theme is "Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life," a not-very-subtle nod to the group's advocacy of placing limits on abortions.

After the group announced it was willing to pay $3 million to air the commercial at the upcoming Super Bowl, a firestorm of protest erupted online, with thousands signing petitions asking CBS to reject the Tebow ad.

Reportedly, CBS has now approved the script and will run the spot, despite a long-standing policy of prohibiting advocacy advertisements, including those with "implicit" messages. Critics point to other advocacy advertisements rejected over the years by the network.

We haven't seen the advertisement yet, but we were curious to know if it might spark any regulatory action. We asked David Oxenford at Davis Wright Tremaine on his view.

In 1987, the FCC abolished the "Fairness Doctrine," requiring broadcasters to present an equitable balance of controversial issues. Oxenford says without a Fairness Doctrine, broadcasters don't have to worry about the FCC getting involved if the commercial only offers a broad look at a controversial issue. But if the commercial advocates some specific federal action, Oxenford says it could trigger some obligation for the station to note in a public file the advertisement and the cost to run it.

And what if CBS decides to now turn away others for their own public issue spots? Might the network be opening themselves to charges of being discriminatory? For instance, check out this Facebook petition that asks CBS to either reject the Tebow ad or run an advertisement in favor of inclusiveness by the United Church of Christ.

Broadcast lawyers say that networks have wide discretion on advertisements. We previously reviewed whether TV stations can refuse to run advertising and although case law seems to indicate that broadcasters are at least two touchdowns ahead of the rabble-rousers, no doubt there may be court filings and pressure on the FCC in the midst. Hey, now that we think about it: Might the Supreme Court be in the mood to tackle another case pitting free speech vs. advertising restrictions?

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Tim Tebow is the new Janet Jackson:

The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter

The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.