Conan's 'Tonight Show' contract revealed

« What Sandra Bullock can teach showbiz dealmakers | Main | Hollywood Docket Top 5: Retrans war!; 'South Park' censorship?; Springsteen retreat »

Conan's 'Tonight Show' contract revealed

Tue Feb 09, 2010 @ 02:35PM PST

By Matthew Belloni

Conanzucker If there was one big mystery in the Great Late-Night Fiasco of 2010, it was whether NBC actually specified in Conan O'Brien's contract that “The Tonight Show” had to begin at 11:35 p.m. This seemingly small detail was of crucial importance to O’Brien, who ended up exiting the network rather than accepting NBC’s offer to move him and “Tonight” to 12:05 a.m. -- a potential violation of his deal, which was never made public.

But we've finally tracked down a copy of the O’Brien contract, and -- lo and behold -- NBC did define “Tonight” as the series that airs at 11:35 as far back as 2002. However, what may have emboldened NBC to move the program anyway was the absence of that key language from later amendments to the deal.

Here's the backstory:

The 2002 timeslot language was part of an amendment to O’Brien’s first contract with NBC, which dated back to his 1993 hiring as host of "Late Night." The provision stipulated that if Jay Leno ever left, O’Brien would be installed as host of “Tonight,” which is described as the “series that airs at 11:35.”

The phrase itself is not only a pretty damning indication of the legal leverage the O’Brien camp held over NBC to extract his hefty $37.5 million-plus settlement, but reveals another new wrinkle in the GLNF2010: The 2002 timing means O’Brien had been waiting seven years for “Tonight,” not the five-year span that is generally reported (for those of you scoring at home).

Moreover, in his original deal to host "Late Night," that show is described as the "second network series after the end of primetime."

Case closed, right? Not exactly. As is common, O'Brien's deal was modified several times. In a 2004 amendment to the deal -- the one that officially promised O'Brien he'd get "Tonight" after a five-year waiting period -- there's no mention of the timeslot.

Insiders familiar with settlement negotiations say NBC jumped on that fact to argue that the "operative" deal was silent on the timeslot issue and even contained some NBC profit-participation boilerplate allowing NBC discretion to move shows as it chooses. 

One problem with that argument: Any lawyer worth his 5% commission knows you've got to read an amended contract in the context of all other prenegotiated elements. O'Brien's 2004 deal incorporated by reference and ratified all the terms of his prior deals -- including the "Tonight Show" definition -- and says any conflicts between NBC's standard terms and the negotiated terms are governed by what's been negotiated.

NBC countered that if the 11:35 timeslot was so important to Conan, his team should have thought to put it in the 2004 amendment -- the one that actually gave O'Brien the show. But Team Coco's response was that they didn't have to. The show was already defined in the deal and was an established institution that had aired directly after the local news for decades.

The differing contractual language may also explain the choice of words NBC Universal CEO Jeff Zucker used in his Jan 18 interview with PBS' Charlie Rose, Zucker's only public comments on the case. Asked by Rose whether O'Brien's deal defined when "Tonight” would air, Zucker paused and said: "In Conan's current
[emphasis ours] contract, there is no guarantee of timeslot for 'The Tonight Show.'"

There were other sticking points in the tense negotiations between O'Brien's team -- led by litigator Patty Glaser, deal lawyer Leigh Brecheen (who had also worked on David Letterman's deal to move from NBC to CBS), agent Rick Rosen and manager Gavin Polone -- and the NBC crew led by execs Marc Graboff, Jeff Gaspin and Andrea Hartman and litigator Scott Edelman with a team from Gibson Dunn & Crutcher.

NBC argued that O'Brien would have trouble proving his damages in court beyond what NBC owed him on his contract. But Team Coco had a nice bit of language in its favor in the 2004 deal, which expressly discusses what Conan gave up in order to wait around for "The Tonight Show." According to the contract, O'Brien "could earn more than double the contracted salary for ["Late Night"] if [O'Brien] were to enter into a contract with a third party at this time." Instead, he gave up that increased money to rely on the promise of a move to the 11:35 "Tonight Show." That language likely would have made it easier for Glaser to paint a picture of a host who sacrificed millions to wait for a show that NBC attempted to materially change.

With whom would an arbitrator or jury have agreed? We'll never know, and both sides say they're happy with O'Brien's settlement of $32.5 million, plus $5 million for executive producer Jeff Ross and additional money for the show's 140 staff members (O'Brien paid a lot of that out of his own pocket).

But given that O'Brien's team got him the big payday, plus the right to look for another job immediately, plus no mitigation or offset damages from any new salary, the settlement suggests NBC was more than a little afraid of how this might play out -- and that Conan's "Tonight" deal wasn't the weak contract NBC wanted us to believe it was.

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d69069e201287747f785970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Conan's 'Tonight Show' contract revealed:


The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to [email protected]

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or [email protected]


The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.