'Hurt Locker' lawsuit hasn't even been served yet

« Hollywood Docket Top 5: Weinstein hoodwinked producer?; CBS affiliates enter Comcast-NBCU debate; Polanski finale? | Main | Federal judge dismisses claims by Stan Lee Media shareholders »

'Hurt Locker' lawsuit hasn't even been served yet

Wed Mar 31, 2010 @ 06:47PM PST

By Matthew Belloni

Hurtlocker Curious what happened with that bombshell lawsuit filed days before the Oscars that said "The Hurt Locker" ripped off an heroic Army Master Sergeant's life story?

So are the defendants.  

Sgt. Jeffrey Sarver claimed in a March 3 complaint that "Locker" screenwriter Mark Boal had lifted the acclaimed movie from his personal story, which was featured in the Playboy article that informed Boal's Oscar-winning screenplay. Yet despite all the press attention, it's been almost a month, and the complaint hasn't officially been served on any of the defendants.

In fact, Sarver's lawyer Geoffrey Feiger tells us he's not sure when it'll be delivered to the defendants, which include distributor Summit Entertainment, producer Voltage Pictures and Greg Shapiro and Nicolas Chartier, Boal and director Kathryn Bigelow. He does say it's coming, and he brushed off a suggestion that the filing (and accompanying press conference hoopla) during Oscar week were just an attempt to scare some settlement money out of Summit and Voltage. 

"It should be served in the next 30 days," Feiger says.

State court lawsuits typically must be served within 30 or 45 days of filing, but Sarver's case was filed in federal court in New Jersey, so Feiger says the delay won't be an issue.

Still, in our experience it's pretty unusual to call a massive press conference to announce the filing of a lawsuit without serving the suit on the defendants immediately. Summit and the other defendants say they're waiting to be served before they move forward in defending the lawsuit. The studio hired litigator David Halberstadter at L.A.'s Katten Muchin firm shortly after it received a letter and a draft complaint from Feiger demanding a seven-figure settlement. But the studio chose not to respond to the letter, which, we're told, expressly threatened a messy public battle if Summit didn't pay up. 

Now we're told Summit hasn't heard from Feiger since his press conference. If the case moves forward, the defense will likely be coordinated through counsel approved by the producers' E&O insurance policy. But that won't happen until the lawsuit is served.

Our question is, will it?  

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d69069e20131100349bc970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Hurt Locker' lawsuit hasn't even been served yet:


The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter, Esq. blog focuses on how the entertainment and media industries are impacted and influenced by the law. It is edited by Matthew Belloni with contributions from veteran legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others. Before joining The Hollywood Reporter, Belloni was a lawyer at an entertainment litigation firm in Los Angeles. He writes a column for THR devoted to entertainment law. Gardner is a New York-based writer and legal journalist. Send tips or comments to Matthew.Belloni@thr.com

The Hollywood Reporter
Contact: Patrice Atiee at 323.525.2014 or patrice.atiee@thr.com


The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. Martin Grove and the other THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.