Is Time Warner Cable about to be sued for copyright infringement?
Tue May 25, 2010 @ 11:11AM PSTIn opposition, Dunlap disputes much of TWC's assertions, including the claim that the cost of compliance is "significant," pointing to $4.6 billion in revenue TWC received in the first quarter of this year and the fact that it pays its employees' salaries, regardless of whether or not it has to respond to plaintiff's subpoena.
"TWC highlights the fact that it is not a party to this case, but it appears that TWC is utilizing that fact to garner public support for its position and possibly in an attempt to gain more subscribers who would value TWC's efforts to protect the privacy of demonstrated copyright infringers. To the extent TWC's tactics are just that — letting the public know that TWC is a good ISP for copyright infringers because TWC will fight any subpoenas relating to infringers' activities — TWC exposes itself to a claim for contributory copyright infringement." (boldface ours)
That sounds like a threat to us. Immediately after this quote, the plaintiffs refers to the U.S. Supreme Court's Grokster decision, which spelled out liability for contributory copyright infringement on behalf of ISPs.